It’s a familiar tale. A football club leaves its ground, only for it to be replaced by housing. Barnet FC recently moved out of their Underhill home and now play their matches at the Hive. This week it was announced that the fixtures and fittings of their ground are for auction.
2nd hand seating, turnstiles & floodlights (18m x 4) available from a major ground clearance. Get in touch for more details – email@example.com pic.twitter.com/m8YVg49kIz
So, if you fancy some seating, turnstiles or floodlights then you know what to do. Email Tom at Sports Ground Development.
It’ll be interesting to know if the floodlights can be re-used by another football club, or whether there is some industrial usage that could be applied to a set of 18m floodlight pylons.
It’s a common occurance in non-league football for different parts of the ground to be re-used elsewhere. Stoke City’s old scoreboard is now used at Southern League Farnborough. Seats from demolished grounds are often transported around the country to help non-league clubs fulfill FA ground grading criteria.
One of the odder stories concerning seats being re-purposed elsewhere comes from Spelthorne Sports who play under the shadow of Heathrow in the Combined Counties League. Their seats came from the Aquatic Centre used in the London 2012 Olympics. The stand itself is a beautiful home-made wooden construction containing the 50 or so seats that have seen some great football over the past 12 months (in addition to Michael Phelps and Rebecca Adlington’s exploits!)
Blogpost on Spelthorne Sports can be found here: http://footygrounds.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/spelthorne-sports-spelthorne-sports-club.html
There have never been as many options for the casual listener in the football podcasting world. Most of the podcasts tend to involve three (normally blokes) chatting and bantering away about (normally Premier League) football. So, it’s nice to see podcasts covering a slightly wider range of topics.
Here are our top seven (in no particular order).
Russian Footbal Network Podcast – with the World Cup being held in Russia during 2018 it may be time for you to brush up on your Russian football knowledge. What better place to start than here.
French Football Weekly – One of the best English language websites covering a foreign country, they also have an informative podcast. Impress your mates by knowing about Newcastle’s latest Gallic signing by listening to this.
FIE Podcast – during the 2016/2017 season this podcast earned many plaudits. Covering all ares of European football, they’re just trying to work out a funding model to see if they can produce it again for the 2017/2018 season.
CalcioLand Pod – If you like your football presented from a cafe by a punning James Richardson drinking a coffee then perhaps Calcio Land is the podcast for you. This pod focuses on Serie A but also includes some interesting subjects related to journalism.
Talking Fussball – If currywurst, beer and a season ticket all for under 100 Euros is your thing then perhaps the Bundesliga is for you. Talking Fussball is probably the most high profile of all German football podcasts. The team behind this pod has been producing podcasts on the subject for many years.
The Finnish Football Show – The Escape to Suomi website has been running for many years and the writer of this very site is involved in a Finnish Football Show. If you want to know your Litmanen’s from your Jussi Jääskeläinens then this may be the podcast for you.
Nordic Football Podcast – Also in Scandanavia (and we’ll avoid the thorny subject of whether Finland is truly Scandanavia or not) we have the Nordic Football Pod. Yes, the Nordic Pod does sound like somewhere a hipster obsessed by frugal living would reside, but it’s actually a podcast that claims to cover football in Sweden and Norway.
The proposal from Gianni Infantino for a 48 team World Cup has been met by an almost unanimous stream of opprobrium by twitter users. Or it was at least opposed by the twitter users I follow. And I guess that’s the point? Most of the people I follow have a UK or US centric view on football/soccer. Both England and the United States are likely to comfortably qualify for 32 team World Cup, despite the best efforts of each country not do (Thanks Allardyce/Klinsmann).
The obvious worries are that it will water-down the competition, that there’ll be too many games and that it will make the Panini album almost impossible to complete without a small bank-loan. All of these concerns are valid (especially the last one). However, if you view the 48 team World Cup from an Asian or African perspective then there are likely to be many more people keen on the idea. After all, only a limited number of countries qualify from these two huge continents and the thought of a couple more places for each continent would surely be voted for by the majority of AFC and CAF nations.
Rather than directly oppose the idea of a 48 team World Cup with groups of three, perhaps the football community should come up with a better format for this World Cup. Perhaps the best 24 nations in the World should qualify automatically, with the second best 24 sides playing off (either in groups of four, or as a straight playoff) for the final 12 places in a 32 team World Cup. This could easily be accommodated in the weeks leading up to a tournament when sides are normally playing warm-up games.
Like many things in football, if the idea makes money it’s likely to be implemented. And 48 teams means more games, and more money. It also gives the nations with the larger TV audiences (like England and USA) that extra bit of leeway, just in case they do wish to employ Gareth Southgate and Bruce Arena as national team coaches.
It’s rare for footballers to play for more than one nation. If a player plays for a country in a FIFA accredited match they are then unable to play for another. However there are still numerous cases of players playing for two different nations before this rule was implemented, also players who have played in friendlies for one country before playing for another and many players have played for sides before and after the fall of the Iron Curtain.
We’ve picked a side of players who have played for more than one nation. The only criteria being that we couldn’t pick more than one player who had the same combinations of countries.
In goal we have former Chelsea shot-stopper Dmirti Kharine. As always when picking XI’s the goalkeeper spot is always the hardest to fill. We’ve chosen Kharine who played for the Soviet Union as well as Russia.
The back-line features Matthias Sammer, an excellent ball playing defender who played for East Germany before re-unification before becoming an important member of Germany’s Euro 96 winning side. Alongside him is Arsenal defender Oleg Luzhny who played for the Soviet Union before its break-up, and played for Ukraine afterwards.
Nacer Chadli is a player whose international alleigances lie across two continents. He played for Morocco in a friendly in Northern Ireland in 2010, yet later committed his international future to Belgium where has played over 30 times for the nation of his birth.
It would be wrong not to have a player who played for Czechoslovakia and one of Czech Republic or Slovakia, and the role in this side goes to Ľubomír Moravčík who played 42 games for Czechoslovakia and 38 times for Slovakia. Alongside him in midfield is Jermaine Jones who played for German youth sides before making three appearances for the full national team in 2008. As these games were only friendlies he still had the opportunity to switch, and did so in 2010 when he opted to play for the United States.
Ferenc Puskas is an interesting addition to the team. One of the greatest players of all time and is famous for playing a huge part in one of the best sides of all time: the Hungarian team of the 1950s. Yet, he took Spanish citizenship in the early 60s and played four games for his adopted nation at the 1962 World Cup. However, by this point of his career the magic was fading and he failed to find the net.
Perhaps even more intriguingly than Puskas, the figure of Kubala also makes our XI. Kubala played internationally for Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Spain. He even turned out for Catalonia in unofficial matches and netted a brace for a Europe XI at Wembley against a England. Kubala played 180 matches for Barcelona and scored 131 times. A self-confessed “cosmopolitan” it would be hard not to make László Kubala captain of this side.
Michel Platini may seem to many to be a surprise selection in this side. However, it’s hard not to include him if only to detail the strange fact that Platini, one of the greatest European players of all time, once turned out for Kuwait in an international friendly (his last ever international match in 1988) Why Platini played for this oil-rich nation is unclear.
Up front is Alfredo Di Stéfano who played for Argentina, Colombia and Spain. The four matches he played for Colombia were not recognised by FIFA, however the games for Argentina and Spain still allow him to qualify for this XI. Despite playing for three separate international sides, Di Stefano never played in a World Cup Finals tournament.
Completing our eleven is Juan Alberto Schiaffino who scored in Uruguay’s 1950 World Cup Final win over Brazil. He later moved to Italy and played for the Azzuri as his grandfather came from the Genoa region. Schiaffino joins an elite club of players to have played or two elite footballing nations as well as three club giants in Penarol, Milan and Roma.
The source from this article, and a more comprehensive list of players who have played for more than one country can be found on the excellent RSSSF site here: http://www.rsssf.com/miscellaneous/double-caps.html
This is a lovely tweet from East Stirlingshire who were recently demoted from the Scottish League and play in the Lowland Leagues. They are trying to ascertain whether the opponents in the clip were Cowdenbeath. This appears very possible as Cowdenbeath are famously nickanmed the Blue Brazils and turn out in blue shirts and white shorts.
Joe Hart’s loan move to Torino means it’s now possible to create an XI of English players who have played in Italy. And it’s quite a team. I’ve selected a 4-2-3-1 formation as it appears Serie A clubs love an English midfielder.
There are plenty of players who miss out on the XI including Trevor Francis, Luther Blissett, Gordan Cowans and Gerry Hitchens. It should also be mentioned that Jay Bothroyd, Tony Dorigo, Franz Carr and Lee Sharpe also miss out (yes, they all played in Italy!).
AMS Clothing have a reputation of producing some of the most eye-catching jerseys in international football. They’ve cornered the market in Africa for creating some excellent designs while Puma churn out the same old boring kits.
They currently supply kits to the African powers of Eritrea, Rwanda, Sierra Leone and one of the newest members of FIFA: South Sudan. If that wasn’t pushing their hipster credentials enough they’ve also recently revealed they are providing the kits for the disputed territory of Western Sahara.
You can take a look at their excellent website here and get yourself kitted out for the new season in style: http://ams-clothing.com/ and you can follow them for all their latest news on twitter here: https://twitter.com/amsclothing1
The history of journalists picking a team of a tournament goes back a long way. The 1958 World Cup in Sweden was no different with a gaggle of journos picking their best 11 from the competition.
Unsurprisingly there are a lot of Brazilians in the starting XI, along with the excellent Raymond Kopa and a few Swedes (they made the final). What’s perhaps startling when you look at the team is that there are five forwards, yet no place is found for Just Fontaine who scored a staggering 13 goals at these finals. What more does a man have to do to make the team?
Despite their being four British teams at the tournament, Harry Gregg of Northern Ireland is the only Brit to make the final XI.
The Football League caused a storm on social media yesterday when it announced plans to reduce the sizes of divisions and add a further eight clubs to the ‘professional game’. It was a surprising move from an organisation that had surely viewed the feedback from Greg Dyke’s B-Teams proposals from two summers ago. Football fans on the whole are conservative, and do not like their game being meddled with and if you are going to meddle with their game, you have to make it clear how it will benefit them. Unfortunately there was little for the fans within the proposal. While it’s clear that the Football League had consulted with the Premier League and the Football Association, it appears that other stakeholders such as football supporters, the non-league game and even the clubs in the Football League themselves weren’t consulted.
The press release is interesting as it makes many claims about fixture congestion, costs of travel and the potential for increased revenues. Where has this information come from? It would be fascinating to know what studies the Football League undertook in order to come to these conclusions. The Football League don’t appear to have consulted the clubs themselves regarding the proposal, so it’ll be interesting to find out what data they used to draw their conclusions from.
While having exactly 100 clubs may satisfy those who enjoy completeness and order, it does raise some interesting questions. One it changes the nature of the FA Cup. Traditionally all Football League sides enter the FA Cup at the First Round stage. Surely this can’t continue if eight more clubs are being added to the league? These clubs can’t automatically gain a First Round berth, as it would restrict entry for the rest of the non-league pyramid. Additionally the non-league pyramid would have to change itself as it would potentially lose eight clubs. The obvious solution is for the upper echelons of the non-league pyramid to slim down the National League (24), South (22) & North (22) to 20 to match the Football League.
What remains most puzzling about this announcement isn’t its contents. It’s that they didn’t feel the need to try and take the clubs with them when coming up with a proposal. Surely if you want to enact change, you need to try and bring as many people with you as you can. Whether it’s arrogance or simply incompetence, it’s hard to tell. What does seem clear from this proposal and the B-Team nonsense is that some sort of change is on the horizon. The Premier League came in 1992, the leagues renamed to the current Championship, League One and League Two in 2004, and if these things go in 12 year cycles we’re due a change. Whether that change is seen as a good one for fans and clubs remains to be seen.